I’ve been re-reading Harry Potter lately (or should I say, listening to the audio book whenever I’m in the car). Don’t ask me how many times I’ve read that series. It’s too many to count. Haha! They are literally are some of the best books ever written. It’s no wonder they became a world-wide phenomenon! I mean, I’m normally not a huge fantasy fan, but HP doesn’t really go overboard with its world-building and focuses more on creating awesome characters and a really interesting and fun story. But, in the meantime, obviously, the world is extremely creative and makes you wish you could be a part of it. I must attribute all of this to JK Rowling’s top notch writing. As I’m listening to the books again, I can’t help but marvel at how she describes things so simply and yet originally that you can picture it so vividly; also how she sets up characters and situations perfectly, writes really witty and realistic dialogue, and so on.
You really love or hate the characters accordingly. She seriously knows how to write them. All of them are endearing with their own quirks and flaws and seem like real human beings. Even the villains/antagonists. From the first introduction, she gives you a sense of how we’re supposed to feel about them and she is SO good at showing and not telling.
Anyways, as I’ve been re-reading the books, I’ve been marveling over all this stuff and I naturally thought how the books are so much better than the movies and I pity anyone who’s only watched the movies. But, that doesn’t mean there aren’t redeeming qualities to the films. They’re actually quite good depictions of their subject matter, but there’s only so much you can do when it comes to adapting a book, especially when the books get longer and longer AND they are literally the best books EVER!
My point here is that as I’ve been comparing the books to the movies, I was thinking about who were the best casting choices for some of the characters because honestly, some of them were SPOT ON! So I did the only logical thing... I made a list ;P
This is the top 10 casting choices for the Harry Potter franchise. I’ve based my judgements not just on the visual elements (how much they look like their characters), but also on how well they capture the essence of their character. Off we go then:
10) Richard Griffiths as Vernon Dursley
“a large, beefy man with a mustache and very little neck.”
Harry’s uncle’s mustache is mentioned probably more than any of his other physical traits (unless you count the reddening or purpling of his face whenever he gets angry). So, of course, if he didn’t have a mustache, he wouldn’t be on this list. I think he might actually have dark hair as opposed to Richard Griffiths’s light hair, but that’s a technicality. This depiction of Uncle Vernon is perfect! His domineering, high-and-mighty, grumbling presence is spot on. The suspicious glare he always makes is exactly the kind of look I would imagine Uncle Vernon giving Harry. I might’ve put him further up the list if he had more screen time.
9) Brendan Gleeson as Alastor “Mad-Eye” Moody
“he lowered his hood, revealing a long mane of grizzled, dark grey hair... a further flash of lightning illuminated his face; it looked as though it has been carved out of weathered wood by someone who had only a vague idea of what a human face looks like. Every inch of his face appeared to be scarred, a large chunk of his nose was missing and his mouth looked like a diagonal gash. One of his eyes was small, dark and beady; the other was large, as round as a coin, and a vivid, electric blue. The blue eye moved constantly, without blinking, and rolled around quite independently of the normal eye.”
If that’s not an introduction, I don’t know what is. Again, the hair color is different in the movie, but that’s just a technicality in this case. (Now if Ron’s or any of the Weasleys’s hair were different, then I would be outraged.) Looking at him, you can definitely tell who he’s supposed to be. I personally think they could’ve mangled his face up a little bit more according to JK Rowling’s description, but I’m still satisfied with what they gave us. Besides, I think they might not have wanted to scare any young children watching. Also, Gleeson’s performance is intimidating enough that they didn’t need any heavy prosthetics or makeup. Every scene he was in, I felt sucked into his performance and was sure I was watching the real Mad-Eye Moody. “CONSTANT VIGILANCE!!!”
8) Christian Coulson as Tom Riddle (Chamber of Secrets)
“a miniature of his handsome father; tall for his age, dark-haired and pale.”
I really didn’t like the depiction of Tom Riddle in the later films. They made him way too creepy and even sort of creepy looking. The books clearly say that Tom Riddle was handsome and charming and everyone liked him. It was really only Dumbledore who ever suspected he was hiding something darker underneath the facade. I mean, the movies make him so obviously a not-so-subtle bad guy. Anyways, to my point: I thought the depiction of him when we first meet him in The Chamber of Secrets was exactly how he was supposed to be. He was handsome, a smooth-talker, and seemed completely normal until he revealed his true colors. And to top it off, the actor fits that little description at the top there, eh?
7) Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy
“white-blond hair, cold grey eyes and a pale, pointed face.”
The description doesn’t say it, but Malfoy’s hair was always described as slicked back which the first two movies got right, but eventually they started doing his hair differently. However, this didn’t bother me because Tom Felton captured Malfoy’s pompous, sneering personality to a T. Even as a child actor where sometimes kids can be a little shaky in their acting, he knew exactly what he was doing and played Harry’s sworn enemy just as he should. Everyone loves how he says “Potter!” He’s such a little twerp.
6) David Bradley as Argus Filch
“Pale... with bulging, lamp-like eyes.”
Filch doesn’t have a lot of physical description in the books, but you really get a feel for who he is and can picture what he looks like based on his personality and actions. So when the movies came out and David Bradley was cast, I was immediately like, “Yes! That’s EXACTLY Filch!” Even though Filch doesn’t get a lot of screen time in any of the films, every time he shows up, I am so impressed with how well he’s portrayed. Just the way he looks and talks, you hate him. You can see how cantankerous and bitter he is and why the students despise him. He’s such a little busy body.
5) Julie Walters as Molly Weasley
“a plump, red-haired witch”
Again, another character without a lot of physical description, but you really get her essence through her actions. Julie Walters exactly captures that essence. She’s so motherly and kind, but also fussy and stern when she needs to be. Plus, she’s the one who kills one of the biggest... shall we say nuisances (to put it lightly?) in the book which makes her a total boss! The movies leave out several big scenes involving her, but the scenes that are there, she plays perfectly. And if her hair wasn’t red, that obviously would be a deal breaker. Ha!
4) Richard Harris as Albus Dumbledore (movies 1-2)
“an elderly man with bright blue eyes, silver hair and beard long enough to tuck into his belt... half-moon spectacles and his long, crooked nose looked as though it has been broken at least twice.”
I don’t think it would be that hard to get any elderly person to look like that description. Just put on a wig and fake beard and bam! Dumbledore. However, all HP fans know for a fact that not anybody can play him. We are actually able to compare performances in this case. Richard Harris died shortly after completing The Chamber of Secrets and had to be replaced. While Michael Gambon did a fine job (save the infamous “HARRY DIDJYA PUT YOUR NAME IN THE GOBLET OF FIYAH!?!!!?!!), there’s no replacing Richard Harris. Throughout most of the books, Dumbledore is a pretty mysterious figure and no one really knows what he’s actually thinking or planning, or even how much he knows about things. A lot of people sort of think he’s a little bit off his rocker 50% of the time. He’s kind and understanding, always with a (shall we say mischievous?) twinkle in his eye. But then you get the sense that he’s at least three steps ahead of everybody and knows more than he’s telling. Plus, everyone knows he’s one of the greatest wizards who ever lived... And that is all encapsulated in Richard Harris’s performance. He was the PERFECT Dumbledore.
3) Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter
Harry is described as having his father's perpetually untidy black hair, his mother's bright green eyes, and a lightning bolt-shaped scar on his forehead. He also is "small and skinny for his age" with "a thin face" and "knobbly knees" and he wears round eyeglasses.
As the main character, there was obviously a lot of pressure to find the right kid to play him. Personally, I think they hit the mark. Daniel Radcliffe is a really good actor and gets it all pretty much right, not to mention he looks the part. There’s been a lot of alterations as far as his appearance goes as the movies go on and of course he’s grown up; but I think the third movie best captured his character’s book description. I know his eyes aren’t green (which is a big deal to some), but I can look past it (usually). The only time it becomes annoying is in the last movie when we actually see Lily and her eyes are NOTHING like his! Anyways, Radcliffe really does his best to play his character to the best of his ability. There are a few things off about the character throughout the movies, but it’s not his fault, it’s the scriptwriters. For example, in the books, Harry is a sassy little turd, always coming up with great zingers. In the movies, this isn’t captured very well, and yet I feel like Radcliffe does a pretty good job of bringing some humor to the character all the same; he always has the best facial expressions and reactions. Harry’s also very angsty and dramatic, particularly in the later books. It takes a strong actor to pull off those dramatic scenes. I know, for example, one of the reasons Sirius’s death is muted is because Radcliffe’s scream of agony was so sad, the director didn’t want to include it.
2) Kenneth Branagh as Gilderoy Lockhart
“handsome... a wide, white smile and wavy blond hair.”
Another character whose essence is more captured through his actions rather than his descriptions (though there are several mentions of his stupid smile). Here’s one character who you love to hate. He’s SO completely useless and stupid! It’s really difficult to convey how ridiculous he is-- for example, in an attempt to show off, he accidentally makes all the bones in Harry’s arm disappear while trying to mend one broken bone. He’s always convinced everyone wants a picture or an autograph and is bragging about some feat he performed. What a twit! He wears a lot of flashy, bright-colored robes and goes around winking and flashing his dazzling smile at everyone. He also keeps several pictures of himself in his office who all wink and smile just like the real thing. Anyways, Kenneth Branagh IS Gilderoy Lockhart! First of all, look at him! It’s like he jumped out of the book. And then, the stupid voice he uses is just EXACTLY what I hear in my head when I read. I get such a kick out of watching his performance 1) because Lockhart is so ridiculous and 2) because I’m in awe of how spot on he is.
1) Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall
“A tall, stern-looking witch with black hair usually drawn into a tight bun... an imposing figure who can quickly spot trouble.”
I think every single Potter fan will agree with me on this one. Maggie Smith is THE most perfect casting choice in the franchise. First of all, she 100% looks the part. I mean LOOK! Harry’s first impression of her is that she’s not a person to be crossed. And isn’t that your impression of her too, looking at her? The books always talk about how McGonagall’s mouth tightens when she’s angry or thinking and Smith gets that exactly. Also, while McGonagall is very stern and strict, she has a soft side and a hidden sense of humor which occasionally shines through. Smith really knows how to balance these sides of McGonagall perfectly. I cannot even convey well enough how perfect this casting choice is! It still impresses me! I’ve heard before that JK Rowling had Maggie Smith in mind either when they were casting or even when she was writing the character (I can’t remember which). In any case, bravo!
HONORABLE MENTIONS:
David Thewlis as Remus Lupin
"The stranger was wearing an extremely shabby set of wizard's robes that had been darned in several places. He looked ill and exhausted. Though quite young, his light brown hair was flecked with grey.”
Robbie Coltrane as Rubeus Hagrid
“He was almost twice the height of a normal man and at least five times the width, with feet the size of baby dolphins and hands the size of dustbin lids. His black eyes glint like beetles and his face was almost completely hidden by a wild, tangled beard and bushy, black hair.”
Alan Rickman as Severus Snape
“sallow skin, greasy hair, a hooked nose, and black eyes.”
Imelda Staunton as Dolores Umbridge
“a short squat woman resembling a large pale toad. She had a broad, flabby face, a wide, slack mouth, and little neck. Her eyes were bulging and pouchy, and in her mousy brown hair she often wore a black velvet bow, which reminded Harry of a fly perched dangerously above a toad, furthering Umbridge's toad-like characteristics. She spoke with a simpering high-pitched voice that was girlish and breathless, contrary to her appearance.”